Joker: Folie à Deux — Everyone Wanted the Joker. No One Wanted Arthur Fleck.



This review contains spoilers and reflects my personal interpretation of the film.


“A word of caution. This is not a comedy club. You are not on stage.”

But to Arthur Fleck, the world has always been a stage.

In Joker, the stage was where Arthur failed as a comedian and succeeded as a symbol. His jokes earned silence, but his violence inspired applause. By the end of the film, Gotham had transformed a lonely, unstable man into something much larger than himself.

The Joker.

Todd Phillips’s Joker: Folie à Deux begins by asking what happens when that image becomes more valuable than the person trapped inside it.

The answer is brutal.

Everyone wants the performance.

No one wants Arthur.



Me and My Shadow

The film opens with an animated short titled “Me and My Shadow,” created in the style of a vintage Warner Bros. cartoon.

Arthur’s shadow separates from his body, steals the spotlight, performs for an audience, commits violence, and leaves Arthur to receive the punishment. Before the live-action story has even begun, the entire film has already been summarized.

The shadow becomes a star.

The body pays the price.

This is the central conflict of Folie à Deux. Arthur Fleck and the Joker are treated as though they might be separate identities, but the film is less interested in offering a clinical explanation than in examining the social function of that division.

Arthur is weak, frightened, needy, and often ridiculous.

The Joker is confident, theatrical, dangerous, and adored.

Arthur’s attorney, Maryanne Stewart, tries to argue that the Joker is an alternate personality responsible for his crimes. Her strategy depends on separating the man from the mask.

“You’re not Joker,” she tells him. “You’re Arthur Fleck.”

But almost everyone else prefers the opposite conclusion.

The media wants the Joker.

The crowds want the Joker.

Lee Quinzel wants the Joker.

Even the audience arriving for a sequel titled Joker naturally expects him to return.

Arthur is surrounded by people demanding that his shadow step forward.



A Man Who Wants Love, a Woman Who Wants a Myth

The film’s musical structure makes the difference between Arthur and Lee particularly clear.

Arthur sings “What the World Needs Now Is Love,” a song that insists the world does not need another mountain to climb. It already has enough mountains. What it lacks is love.

Lee answers with a different fantasy.

“We’re Gonna Build a Mountain.”

Arthur wants to be loved by one person.

Lee wants to build something larger than either of them.

She does not merely want a relationship. She wants to participate in a myth. Arthur’s murders, television appearance, makeup, and public following have already created a story in her imagination. She falls in love not with the fragile prisoner in front of her, but with the dangerous cultural figure she believes he can become again.

This makes Lee more than a new version of Harley Quinn.

She becomes a reflection of the audience.

Like many viewers of the first film, she was fascinated by Arthur when he stopped apologizing, painted his face, danced down the stairs, and turned violence into public spectacle. She expects the sequel to continue that ascent.

When Arthur begins rejecting the Joker identity, Lee loses interest.

She does not want the man beneath the makeup.

She wants him to put the makeup back on.

Todd Phillips later described Arthur as an “unwitting icon,” a man burdened with an identity Gotham placed upon him. According to Phillips, Arthur’s courtroom confession represents his decision to stop living as that false image and admit that he was Arthur all along.

The tragedy is that honesty does not save him.

It makes him unlovable to the people who claimed to love him.



Why a Musical?

The decision to turn the sequel into a jukebox musical was widely treated as either its boldest idea or its most disastrous mistake.

Yet music is not entirely foreign to Arthur.

In the first film, he repeatedly expresses what he cannot say through dance. His bathroom dance after the subway murders, the staircase sequence, and his movements backstage before appearing on Murray Franklin’s show all turn emotion into performance.

Phillips explained that Arthur had always possessed an internal musicality, and that meeting someone who appeared to love him would naturally allow the music inside his head to emerge more fully.

In Folie à Deux, the musical sequences create a temporary space where Arthur and Lee can become the people they imagine themselves to be.

Reality gives them prison uniforms, courtrooms, guards, cameras, and legal definitions.

Fantasy gives them tailored suits, spotlights, orchestras, romantic dances, and an audience waiting to applaud.

The songs are therefore not interruptions of reality.

They are escapes from it.

At their best, these sequences expose the difference between what Arthur experiences and what actually exists. He imagines a romance grand enough to rescue him, while the real relationship remains unstable and conditional.

The musical fantasy gives Arthur everything life has denied him.

Love.

Elegance.

Control.

A perfect ending.

But the device does not always succeed.

Several numbers repeat emotions the film has already explained, rather than developing the relationship or moving the story forward. The contrast between lavish fantasy and bleak reality is effective, but repeated so often that it gradually loses its force.

The film understands why Arthur sings.

It is less certain what every individual song adds.



That’s Entertainment

The most revealing musical choice may be “That’s Entertainment.”

Its lyrics describe romance, betrayal, sex, murder, tragedy, and even Oedipus Rex, before reducing them all to the same conclusion.

That is entertainment.

The song captures the film’s darkest idea: once suffering is presented on a stage, the audience can consume almost anything as spectacle.

Arthur’s murders became entertainment in the first film.

Now his trial becomes entertainment.

His trauma is replayed for television audiences. Witnesses are forced to relive what he did. Reporters wait for a performance. Supporters dress like him. Lee observes from the gallery, hoping that the Joker will emerge.

Even Arthur becomes addicted to the attention.

The courtroom is supposedly a place where responsibility will be determined, but the question of guilt is less important to the crowd than the question of identity.

Who will appear today?

Arthur Fleck or the Joker?

The film is therefore not truly structured as a legal thriller. There is little mystery surrounding Arthur’s actions. The trial functions as another theater, one in which competing versions of Arthur are performed for an audience.

His attorney performs the victim.

The prosecution performs the monster.

Lee waits for the celebrity.

Arthur eventually dismisses his lawyer and performs the Joker himself.

The danger is that Folie à Deux also becomes trapped inside this repetition. Large sections of the trial revisit events from the previous movie without revealing enough that is emotionally new. The film wants to expose the audience’s appetite for spectacle, but sometimes confuses denying satisfaction with creating insight.

Its refusal to entertain is thematically coherent.

It can also be dramatically exhausting.



The Joke Stops Being Funny

Arthur initially welcomes the Joker identity because it gives him something his ordinary life never could.

Attention.

Desire.

A sense of control.

But the trial forces him to see the damage hidden behind the applause.

Gary Puddles does not remember the Joker as a revolutionary symbol. He remembers watching a colleague brutally murdered. A young inmate admires Arthur, defends him, and is killed by the guards.

The Joker has become meaningful to strangers, but not in a way Arthur can control.

His performance gives people courage, but it also gives them permission to suffer and die in his name.

After being abused by the guards and hearing another prisoner killed, Arthur no longer experiences the Joker as liberation. He sees the identity as another system using his pain for its own purpose.

The crowd wants him to be a leader.

Lee wants him to be a fantasy.

His attorney wants him to be a diagnosis.

The prosecution wants him to be a monster.

For perhaps the first time, Arthur decides to be only himself.

He confesses that there is no separate Joker.

There is only Arthur Fleck.

It is not a heroic moment.

It is small, exhausted, and painfully human.

He removes the makeup, and the world loses interest.



The Weight of Expectation

This is why the film’s rejection by audiences is inseparable from its meaning—but expectation alone cannot explain all of its failures.

Many viewers understandably wanted a sequel with momentum: Arthur and Lee escaping, Gotham descending further into chaos, or the Joker becoming the criminal figure suggested by the DC name.

The film deliberately refuses each possibility.

That refusal is interesting.

It is not automatically satisfying.

The courtroom scenes are often repetitive. Lee is conceptually fascinating but emotionally underwritten. Her role as Arthur’s lover, manipulator, fellow fantasist, and audience surrogate gives her enormous thematic importance, yet the film rarely permits her to exist independently of Arthur.

Contemporary reviews repeatedly identified similar problems: the story appeared dramatically static, the musical numbers did not consistently advance the narrative, and Lady Gaga’s character felt underused despite her strong presence.

The film knows exactly what it wants to deny.

It is less consistent in providing something equally powerful in its place.

Still, its hostility toward conventional sequel expectations gives it a strange artistic integrity. Rather than turning Arthur into a glamorous criminal mastermind, it dismantles the mythology created around him.

The first film showed a forgotten man becoming an icon.

The second shows the icon crushing the man who created it.



No One Wanted Arthur

Near the end, Arthur finds Lee on the stairs that once marked his transformation.

In the first film, those stairs became a stage. Arthur descended them as the Joker, dancing toward the identity that would finally make the world notice him.

Now he returns without the performance.

He wants to speak plainly.

Lee responds with another song.

Arthur asks her to stop singing.

The line is devastating because music had been the language of their shared fantasy. Asking her to stop means asking her to meet him in reality.

She cannot.

Without the Joker, there is no romance.

Without the performance, there is no folie à deux.

Lee walks away because Arthur Fleck was never the person she came to find.

Soon afterward, Arthur is murdered by another inmate who tells him a joke, stabs him as the punchline, and appears to carve a smile into his own face behind Arthur’s dying body.

The identity survives.

The man does not.

That final image completes the film’s argument. Joker was always larger than Arthur. Once Gotham, Lee, the media, and the audience invested in the image, it no longer belonged to him. Someone else could inherit it, perform it, and become the figure Arthur never truly was.

The shadow finds another body.

The tragedy of Folie à Deux is not simply that Arthur dies.

It is that he finally tells the truth about himself at the precise moment when nobody wants to hear it.

Lee loved the Joker.

The crowd worshipped the Joker.

The media sold the Joker.

The audience came back to see the Joker.

Everyone wanted the performance.

No one wanted Arthur Fleck.




Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post